It has even deployed ML models to scan for potential threats continuously and has the biggest malware signature database.īut the persistent attacks using any potential or unpatched vulnerabilities of the operating system are leveraged by hackers for their nefarious ends. In fact, the security engineering of the Windows operating system at Microsoft has rolled out significant innovations in the last few years to tackle cybersecurity issues. On the technical side, Windows is equally, if not more, secure than other operating systems. The majority of new malware are therefore designed for Windows specifically in mind. The size of people that use Windows is massive, and because of this, hackers around the globe target the operating system more than the other ones.
WindowsĪccording to experts, the reason why Windows is considered less secure than competing operating systems is not because of the lack of security standards and innovation from Microsoft, but because of its large attack surface and predominant use in enterprises. First is Windows, the most widely used OS particularly in the enterprise space, then we have macOS, the Unix-based OS used in Apple’s computers and finally, the open-source Linux (and associated distributions) used scarcely by a select group of people for niche applications. So, we have three leading OSs in the world. Is Mac more secure than Windows devices from hackers? In this article, we take a look at the various factors that compare operating systems for cybersecurity posture. But what about the inherent nature of a specific OS. For operating systems, enterprises have anti-malware solutions installed on the devices themselves. For example, they could have a dedicated security operations centre along with firewalls, SIEM and identity management solutions for cybersecurity. Businesses allocate a lot of resources in making sure that their systems are secure.
0 kommentar(er)
